![]() |
The Image of Real Beauty? via Lexis Agency |
There are many things that bother me in this world. That's why I have a blog. So I can whine about them in peace, and not harass people who don't want to hear about it. But there's something happening in the body politics debate that has been bothering me in the last few months, and I want to lay it out in the open.
The Dove "Real Beauty" campaign is problematic.
In the last few months, I've seen countless advertisements from Dove touting their dedication to "real" beauty and "real" women. Naturally, all the women in the ads are older, curvier, and often, women of colour.
Now, you must be asking yourself what could possibly be my issue with a campaign that seeks to radically change the definition of beauty? Dove's ads have taken women who are typically ignored by major beauty franchises and elevated them to star status. This is what we've been asking for, right? Dove has finally done what no other company would. They listened. So what's the problem?
The problem with Dove's campaign is that it is working on a zero-sum continuum of beauty. Instead of opening the definition of "beauty" to be more inclusive, it is simply changing it to exclude a different subset of women.
The answer to the beauty question isn't "real women have curves", it's "all women are real, and they're all equally beautiful." By labeling older, curvier women as "real", they are automatically labeling younger, more slender bodies as "unreal", which is obviously not okay. Those bodies are just as real. They are simply different.
In situations where one party in a discussion feels marginalized or ignored, it gets very easy to fire back at the other side on a personal level. The fashion industry has long had a preference for younger, more slender and yes, white bodies. But that isn't the fault of young, slender, Caucasian women. There is definitely needs to be a change in the mean demographics of the fashion industry. We've made strides over the years, and there is obviously still a long way to go. But making these women feel as poorly about their bodies as women of colour and size have felt for years does nothing to elevate our cause. All it does is create a different kind of divisiveness that is equally as sinister.
The answer to the body image question isn't to designate an ideal. That will always leave someone feeling left out and slighted. The answer is to be more inclusive. To accept all diverse body types as acceptable and beautiful. By shifting the definition of beauty instead of expanding it, we're just rehashing the same problems.
Dove's campaign is commendable in what it's trying to achieve but it fails in the execution. It's time we become more conscious of the issues facing women in today's world, and be more mindful not to alienate some women in order to appease others.
What do you think? Do you agree that the campaign is problematic? How do you think the campaign can be improved? What would you have done differently? Let me know in the comments below.
I don't think the Dove campaign in anyway says that young and slender isn't pretty. They are over represented as it is. The thing I notice most about the Dove campaign is the proportions of the women. Models have very specific limb and torso proportions besides being tall and thin. The women in this ad have many different limb and torso lengths. It wasn't until this campaign that I ever really noticed this, but it made me see women as far more varied and individual than any other beauty campaign ever has. It really brought home the message that just being thin won't help you achieve the "standard" beauty look unless you have the proportions on a model. These women are beautiful without being the standard of beauty more because of the difference in the proportions than because they aren't thin. When you realize that most people vary widely in their proportions AND are beautiful you are changing the face of what it means to be a beautiful woman in America. Also, as for the age thing, it has always been a pet peeve of mine when they use super young people without wrinkles, age spots, etc to advertise products meant for older people so I think it's great that they use people the appropriate age for the products they are selling.
ReplyDeleteThis isn't about explicit messages. It's about implicit ones. I don't think for a second that the people at Dove want or mean to alienate thinner, younger or conventionally attractive women. It also isn't about limb proportion. It's about the implication that if these women are "real" other women are "less real". I agree that the thin archetype gets most of the representation, but as I said in the article, beauty isn't zero sum. But qualifying these women as real, we are necessarily qualifying thin women as unreal, when in reality all women are real and equally beautiful. We don't want to move from fetishizing one body ideal to fetishizing another. We want to open up the definition of beauty to include all women.
ReplyDeleteI've written an article about this myself: http://www.thegeekmemoirs.com/dove-adverts-are-hypocritical/ it follows the same idea, but also talks about how 'fake' the adverts themselves are with photoshopping and make up.
ReplyDeleteI don't know, I am a 23-year old, 5'9", 125 lb, white-passing woman and I don't feel devalued or excluded when I see images of attractive curvier/older/PoC women. Maybe it's because, often, these images don't rely on heavy photoshopping, make-up, and oversexualization to reach aesthetic ends. As Lauren said, images of young, thin white women are over represented. I actually feel much, much more devalued when I see images of women that look a lot like me (young, skinny, white) but extremely idealized, "fit", and fake. There's a blatant discrepancy between that skinny white girl and this one.
ReplyDeleteIt is hard to nail down what is troublesome about the Real Beauty campaign, but I have also felt annoyed by it. I was thinking it is because they are celebrating beauty instead of confidence on a lot of their ads. I wrote about the sketch artist ad after it became the highest watched ad. EVER. Dove's been running this campaign for 9 years. I'd like to see more from it. http://www.virginiaingram.com/thoughts/2013/5/22/congratulations-dove-now-expand-your-messaging
ReplyDeleteI leave a comment each time I like a post on a site or if I
ReplyDeletehave something to contribute to the discussion. It is a result of the passion displayed in the post I
read. And after this article "Changing the Conversation: The Dove "Real
Beauty" Campaign and the Debate on "Real" Women". I was actually moved enough
to drop a leave a responsea response ;-) I actually do have a few questions for you if
it's okay. Is it only me or does it look like a few of the comments appear like
they are left by brain dead folks? :-P And, if you are posting at
other social sites, I'd like to keep up with everything fresh you have
to post. Would you make a list all of your communal pages like your twitter feed,
Facebook page or linkedin profile?
my site: Revitalize Skin Cream ()
I personally find it interesting that Dove is owned by Unilever, which also owns the brand Axe, which has a history of sexist advertising. So while seeking to empower women on one side, they devalue them on the other. Because of this I can't help but see it as just a ploy to make more money.
ReplyDelete